The Uncertainty of AI in Completing Unfinished Novels: A Moral Dilemma

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in completing unfinished novels has sparked a new debate in the literary world. With advancements in AI technology, it is now possible to generate versions of incomplete works by famous authors, raising questions about originality, ethics, and the rights of the departed.

In a recent development, Japanese novelist Rie Kudan acknowledged that a portion of her award-winning book was generated verbatim by ChatGPT, a language model powered by AI. This revelation has led to discussions about the boundaries between human creativity and AI assistance in the creative process.

The concept of “AI editions” of unfinished books has opened up new possibilities for completing literary classics that remain incomplete due to the authors’ passing. From Charles Dickens to Jane Austen, there are numerous unfinished works that could potentially be brought to completion with the help of AI technology.

However, the use of AI in literature also raises complex moral and philosophical questions. How should we define originality in works that are partially created by AI? What are the implications for intellectual property rights and the legacy of the original authors?

Despite the potential benefits of using AI to complete unfinished novels, there is a lingering sense of uncertainty. AIs are known to be biased, prone to hallucinations, and lacking a sense of reality. This raises concerns about the authenticity and integrity of AI-generated literary works.

As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the literary world will navigate the intersection of AI technology and creative writing. The use of AI in completing unfinished novels may offer new insights and perspectives, but it also poses challenges that need to be carefully considered and addressed.